logo Guidomedia.com
An Australian publishing resource
Home | News | Resources | Research | Leisure | About us | Jobs | Main index
News

Sources & sites

Resources
Publishing info
Style guides
Public relations
Research
Journals
Our projects
Articles
Leisure
Assorted reading
About us
About the site
Email contact
Jobs
Recent ads
Events & dates
Not to be missed

Our other mags
Main Guidomedia index

 


Benton media news digest – 2006

8 Dec: MORE FAMILIES PLAYING VIDEO GAMES BUT CONCERNS REMAIN [SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Leah Schnurr] A new generation of technologically savvy parents are turning gaming into a family event, according to a new survey, but critics pushing for greater monitoring of video game content remain concerned. 58% of respondents in an online survey said they play video games and more than half this time is spent with their children. The survey found 74 percent of parents are comfortable with video games becoming a part of their family life and most are familiar with an industry ratings system used to assess what age group should play certain games and used as a guide to the kind of content in the games, such as the levels of violence. But David Walsh, president of the National Institute on Media and the Family, said the numbers did not represent parents in general as online surveys are more likely to be completed by people who are technologically inclined. The survey comes as a bitter political battle over violent content in video games shows some signs of cooling with two of the industry's fiercest critics, Sens Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and Joe Lieberman (D-CT), due later Thursday to join forces with the industry's own rating board in a nationwide educational television campaign.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&storyID=2006-12-07T173535Z_01_N06478418_RTRUKOC_0_US-LEISURE-GAMING-RATINGS.xml&WTmodLoc=TechNewsHome_C1_%5bFeed%5d-2

TEENS AND MEDIA: A FULL-TIME JOB [SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Stefanie Olsen] According to a study released this week, Americans aged 13 to 18 spend more than 72 hours a week using electronic media--defined as the Internet, cell phones, television, music and video games. Because teens are known for multitasking, their usage of devices can overlap. So much technology makes teens feel they are playing a starring role in their own reality TV show, said Jim Taylor, vice chairman of the Harrison Group, which conducted the 2006 Teen Trend study. "This generation is unique," Taylor said. "Teen life has become a theatrical, self-directed media production."
http://news.com.com/Teens+and+media+a+full-time+job/2100-1041_3-6141920.html?tag=nefd.top

POLL SHOWS IM GAP BETWEEN TEENS, ADULTS [SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Will Lester] A new AP-AOL survey finds that almost half of teens, 48 percent of those 13-18, use instant messaging -- more than twice the percentage of adults who use it. Additional findings include: 1) Almost three-fourths of adults who do use instant messages still communicate with e-mail more often. Almost three-fourths of teens send instant messages more than e-mail. 2) More than half of the teens who use instant messages send more than 25 a day, and one in five send more than 100. Three-fourths of adult users send fewer than 25 instant messages a day. 3) Teen users (30 percent) are almost twice as likely as adults (17 percent) to say they can't imagine life without instant messaging. 4) When keeping up with a friend who is far away, teens are most likely to use instant messaging, while adults turn first to e-mail.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/INSTANT_MESSAGING_AP_POLL?SITE=TXWIC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

7 Dec: LEAN LEFT? LEAN RIGHT? NEWS MEDIA MAY TAKE THEIR CUES FROM CUSTOMERS [SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Austan Goolsbee] Most people expect spin from politicians. When they perceive partisan slant in the news itself, they typically interpret it as evidence of underlying bias by reporters or media owners. But one of the most interesting things coming out of research on the economics of the media industry has been the notion that media slant may simply reflect business rather than politics. New research by two University of Chicago economists, Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro, entitled “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence From U.S. Daily Newspapers” compiles some compelling and altogether unusual data to answer the question. Papers like The Washington Times or The Deseret Morning News of Salt Lake City used Republican phrases while papers like The San Francisco Chronicle and The Boston Globe used Democratic ones. But more important, once the authors had this measure, they showed that the main driver of any slant was the newspaper’s audience, not bias by the newspaper’s owner. A comparison of circulation data (per capita) to the ratio of Republican to Democratic campaign contributions by ZIP code showed that circulation was strongly related to whether the newspaper matched the readers’ own ideology. Their measure indicates that The Los Angeles Times, for example, is a liberal paper. Its circulation suffers in Southern California ZIP codes where donations to Republicans are especially high. The authors calculated the ideal partisan slant for each paper, if all it cared about was getting readers, and they found that it looked almost precisely like the one for the actual newspaper. As Dr. Shapiro put it in an interview, “The data suggest that newspapers are targeting their political slant to their customers’ demand and choosing the amount of slant that will maximize their sales.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/business/media/07scene.html
(requires registration)
• See the research
http://www.nber.org/papers/w12707.pdf

IF CASTRO HAD A TALK SHOW, IT MIGHT SOUND A BIT LIKE THIS [SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Andy Newman] A look at “Ayer en Miami (Yesterday in Miami),” a radio show aired on WOCN-AM (1450) in Miami. It includes advertisements from Cuba’s state travel agency, reports from last weekend’s Fidel Castro birthday parade in Havana, an admiring assessment of Soviet-era tanks, and excerpts from speeches by whichever Castro is running Cuba. It is not a signal-jamming effort beamed from the Cuban coast like some kind of reverse Radio Martí. It is not, compadre, a joke of any sort. It is Francisco Aruca, onetime Cuban political prisoner turned Castro admirer, speaking out from a little radio station on the industrial north side of Miami or, more often these days, from the comfort of his home office in the lush suburb of Pinecrest. For 15 years, Mr. Aruca, founder of the first American company to run charter flights to Cuba, has doubled as on-air apologist for a man whom the vast majority of Cuban-Americans in Miami consider a despicable and murderous dictator. In doing so, Mr. Aruca speaks to — and for — a tiny community of committed Cuban-American leftists who have endured years of public scorn, threats and, in the not-too-distant past, violence.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/us/07cuba.html
(requires registration)

6 Dec: LOCAL TV STILL THE NUMBER 1 NEWS SOURCE [SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Michele Greppi] Local TV is the No. 1 source of news and information among U.S. television viewers, according to Frank N. Magid Associates' findings in a national survey. The study, designed to learn how, how often and why people use an assortment of media platforms, was co-authored by Magid's director of strategic analysis Bryn Burns and senior consultant Laura Clark. They sought information that could help the stations that are Magid TV clients make decisions on how to position themselves in what they call "today's multiscreen world." Many of the findings contrast with some new-technology efforts undertaken by stations. For example, new media offerings have yet to establish their popularity. Streaming video stories, blogs and podcasts aren't luring many people to stations' Web sites, according to the study. Up-to-date text stories are. In addition, a significant number of people are interested in going to a station's Web site to check out a story they saw on a local newscast.
http://www.tvweek.com/article.cms?articleId=31077
(requires free registration)

5 Dec: IRAN'S WEB CRACKDOWN SHOWS EASE OF GOVERNMENT INTERNET CENSORSHIP [SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Christopher Rhoads christopher.rhoads@wsj.com] Iran's campaign to shutter popular Web sites and curtail text-message traffic reflects the growing ability of governments to control online content inside their national borders. The crackdown is part of a broader offensive against what authorities consider immoral Western culture. It has targeted Web sites including Amazon.com, publicly edited online encyclopedia Wikipedia.com, movie Web site imdb.com and online video-sharing portal YouTube.com, among others. Some of these sites are working again, but the clampdown is consistent with a tightening of online content in Iran dating back two years. The blockage isn't airtight, as more-savvy Internet users in the country have access to software and other measures that allow them to get around government restrictions, Internet experts say. It is uncertain how long the restrictions will last. Iran is one of a host of nations that have taken steps to limit access to the Internet or control what users can see in cyberspace. Others that have taken such steps include China, Cuba and North Korea. Tehran's recent actions are noteworthy given the country's flourishing and relatively free Internet culture in recent years. Iran has an estimated 7.5 million users, up from 250,000 six years ago. A lively blogosphere emerged in recent years, as state control of the country's traditional print media increased.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116528658477840719.html?mod=todays_us_page_one (requires subscription)

4 Dec: WHY NETWORK NEUTRALITY WILL BE LAW IN 2007 [SOURCE: Huffington Post, AUTHOR: Jason Pontin, Technology Review] [Commentary] One of the first technology controversies that the new Democratic Congress will address when it meets in 2007, will be network neutrality. Here's what will happen: legislators will support new regulation. Democrats know network neutrality regulation, far from representing a creeping expansion of government interference, will simply preserve the established openness of the Internet. Indeed, the failure to enact network neutrality regulation would implicitly authorize the service providers to override the separation of the transport and application layers of the Internet. And that would represent the erosion of the authority of the foundational Internet standards that has made the 'Net into the greatest force for economic expansion and human communications in history. Sometime early in the New Year, therefore, Congress will reform the Telecommunications Act of 1996. They will require Internet providers to allow consumers access to any application, content, or service.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-pontin/why-network-neutrality-wi_b_35328.html

CONTENT AND OWNERSHIP [SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Craig Kuhl] By 2009, more than 108 million digital TV subscribers worldwide will be accessing thousands of video-on-demand (VOD) programs and moving massive amounts of content from device to device. That expected explosion of special content delivery holds tremendous upside, and one enormous danger: piracy. Preventing this valuable content from being stolen by consumers or illegally downloaded is now an industry imperative. It's pushing cable operators, broadcasters, movie studios, record companies and their partnering industries -- such as set-top box manufacturers -- to new content-protection heights. Next-generation methodologies and technologies such as the M Card, DCAS (downloadable conditional-access system) and digital watermarking are expected to offer a more effective means of identifying and tracking just who is accessing the content and how it's paid for, all under the conditional-access (CA) umbrella.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6396711.html?display=Special+Report

NEWSPAPER CHAIN SEES ITS FUTURE, AND IT'S ONLINE AND HYPER-LOCAL [SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Frank Ahrens] Gannett's newspapers are redirecting their newsrooms to focus on the Web first, paper second. Papers are slashing national and foreign coverage and beefing up "hyper-local," street-by-street news. They are creating reader-searchable databases on traffic flows and school class sizes. Web sites are fed with reader-generated content, such as pictures of their kids with Santa. In short, Gannett -- at its 90 papers, including USA Today -- is trying everything it can think of to create Web sites that will attract more readers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/03/AR2006120301037.html (requires registration)

PEDIATRICIANS CALL FOR LESS ADVERTISING TO CHILDREN [SOURCE: USAToday, AUTHOR: Marilyn Elias] Pediatricians should lobby for a ban or severe curtailment on widespread school-based ads, and Congress should prohibit commercials for “junk food” on TV shows watched mostly by young children, the American Academy of Pediatrics says today. The new policy on advertising to kids was prompted by alarm over rising rates of childhood obesity in an atmosphere where kids increasingly are targeted by marketers, says pediatrician Victor Strasburger, the policy's senior author. Since the pediatricians last weighed in on the issue 11 years ago, ads have cropped up everywhere kids turn: the Internet, cellphones, video games, school campuses and even school buses, Strasburger says. Last year, advertisers spent $1.4 billion per month marketing to children — 15% more than in 2004, according to James McNeal, a children's marketing expert and author of The Kids Market: Myths and Realities. An Institute of Medicine report last year found evidence that food and beverage marketing to children 12 and under leads them to ask for and eat and drink non-nutritious products that are high in calories. The new policy calls for Congress and the Federal Communications Commission to limit commercials on children's TV to five to six minutes an hour, a 50% cut from what's now allowed. The pediatrics group also called on makers of Viagra and similar drugs to run commercials only on shows that air after 10 p.m. These ads “make sexual activity seem like a recreational sport,” while birth control commercials that could cut teen pregnancy rates are rarely aired, the policy says.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/life/20061204/bl_bottomstrip_pedes04.art.htm

1 Dec: RAIDING YOUR INBOX [SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff] [Commentary] IN THE LATEST illustration of the Bush administration's disregard for your privacy, the Justice Department is trying to convince a panel of federal judges that the FBI should be free to read your e-mail without obtaining a warrant. It's not all your e-mail -- only messages left on a Web-based system such as Hotmail or on your Internet service provider's computers. A 1986 law forbids the interception and disclosure of e-mail and other online transmissions without a warrant. But there is an exception. If the messages are more than 180 days old, they can be obtained merely with a subpoena or a court order, which investigators can obtain more easily than a warrant. The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals should rein in the feds and strike down the provisions of the law that are out of sync with the technological realities of the broadband era -- and the privacy expectations of Americans.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-ed-email01dec01,1,5868619.story?coll=la-news-a_section (requires registration)

GROUPS URGE COURTS TO LIMIT FCC'S AUTHORITY TO REGULATE SPEECH [SOURCE: Center for Democracy & Technology] As communications technologies converge, courts must rein in the Federal Communications Commission's continued efforts to expand its authority to regulate speech over broadcast media. That is the key message of two friend-of-the-court briefs CDT filed this week in conjunction with Adam Thierer of the Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF) in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd and 3rd Circuits. As an organization focused on the Internet and emerging digital technology, CDT has not typically involved itself in the broadcast indecency debate. But the FCC's increased indecency enforcement is likely in this age of convergence to threaten the underlying freedom of other digital communications. November 30, 2006 Press Release:
http://www.cdt.org/press/20061130fcclimits.php

TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR AIRWAVES [SOURCE: Seattle Times, AUTHOR: FCC Commissioner Michael Copps] [Commentary] What do Americans want from their media? As a commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission, I hear a lot about this issue. I hear that Americans want to listen to hometown talent on the radio and to see local issues and politicians covered on the nightly news. They want an in-depth look at what's going on at City Hall and the schools their children attend. In short, they want to know what's really going on in their neighborhoods and to see the essentials of their own lives reported accurately to the larger world. Even if the future of our media is not your No. 1 issue, it needs to be — it has to be — your No. 2 issue. That's because Americans get their input and develop their views about all the other critical issues of the day — the war, jobs, the economy, health care, education, etc. — from the media. They learn about them on TV news, hear about them on the radio, and read about them in the newspaper. I can't think of any of these issues that wouldn't fare much better in an open, diverse, community-responsive and competitive environment.
http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=copps29&date=20061129&query=copps

Click here for earler Benton files.


(c) Benton Foundation 2003. Redistribution of this email publication -- both internally and externally -- is encouraged if it includes this message:
Communications-Related Headlines are compiled, summarized and edited by Rachel Anderson (rachel@benton.org), Andy Carvin (andy@benton.org) and Charles Meisch (charlie@benton.org) of the Benton Foundation -- we welcome your feedback. Based in Washington DC, the Benton Foundation's mission is to articulate a public interest vision for the digital age and demonstrate the value of communications for solving social problems. Other projects at Benton include:
Digital Divide Network (www.digitaldividenetwork.org)
Digital Opportunity Channel (www.digitalopportunity.org)
OneWorld US (www.oneworld.net/us)
Sound Partners for Community Health (www.soundpartners.org

Return to top

Use this tool to search our site or the web.

Google
WWW Guidomedia.com

Job Watch
See our jobs page.

Free Newsletter
Newsletter
Try our newsletter. Each week (more or less) we email a free summary of media trends stories in an easy-to-read interactive PDF. See our subscription page.

Movers & shakers
See our selection of speeches & papers on media issues... click

Spin City
The Editor's occasional blog… click

 

logo Guidomedia.com
An Australian publishing resource
Home | News | Resources | Research | Leisure | About us | Jobs | Main index